HomeCasesLaw firm

A law firm moves from “AI is forbidden” to “AI cannot leave”.

Lausanne · 12 partners · Numezis 1

Stage
Demonstration on the firm's own documents · purchase decision pending
Machine
Numezis 1
Headcount
34
Circuit
Standard T13 socket · 10 A circuit

What was not working, before us.

Internal rules banned every AI tool. The reason was not technical: article 321 of the Swiss criminal code makes breaching professional secrecy an offence, and no partner wanted to carry that liability for a productivity gain.

The ban held on paper. It did not hold in practice: searching ten years of archives was still manual, and junior staff used consumer tools for seemingly harmless tasks.

What was chosen, and why.

What moved the firm was not a contractual promise but a property of the architecture: content cannot leave because no path takes it out. A confidentiality undertaking can be breached; a machine with no outbound path cannot be breached by accident.

A Numezis 1 is enough: twelve partners and about twenty staff, search and drafting, no training. The configuration was sized on peak usage, not on headcount.

The configuration
MachineNumezis 1 — 1 × RTX PRO 6000
LocationOffice, standard T13 socket
SourcesFirm archives, live matters, internal case law
RightsPer-matter partitioning, taken from the existing folder tree
UsageArchive search, drafting, summarising exhibits
OutboundTechnical telemetry only — no file content
Power drawn685 W · 3 A · 2338 BTU/h
Machine list price39'000 CHF excluding options and annual service — computed from the bill of materials

The section we do not remove.

Anonymised case. Organisations are not named, as no publication agreement has been signed. No measured outcome is published until it exists.

  • The purchase decision itself: to date the firm has seen a demonstration on its own documents, nothing more.
  • Validation of the arrangement by the firm's counsel under art. 321 SCC.
  • Actual time saved on archive search, which will only be measurable after six months.