HomeInvestment

Renting is an expense. Owning is an investment.

A per-seat subscription grows with you and leaves nothing behind. A machine goes on the balance sheet, depreciates and keeps a value. The chart below shows where the two curves cross — and also the cases where they never do.

Rent — public subscriptionOwn — Numezis
75k150k225k300kCrossover · 11 months060 months
25
200 CHF
60 months
Crossover11months · the month owning becomes cheaper
Saving207'000Cumulative gap at horizon
Net position216'750Gap + residual hardware value · ROI 504 %
Hours returned9'000Over the horizon, all teams · 855'000 CHF

Adjustable assumptions. Rent: per-person subscription, all in. Own: machine, installation, annual service — models, support, warranty. Residual value: 25% of hardware at horizon. Risk: annual probability × full incident cost, applied to the rented scenario. Hours returned: 6 h per person per month at CHF 95.

The lease carries the machine. Never the service.

Over 36 months, at the 5 % nominal rate used as a quotation assumption. The annual service is signed directly with us: it has no collateral value and therefore has no place in a lessor's contract.

MachineCash36-month leaseAnnual service
Numezis 139'000 CHF1'289 CHFper month10'000 CHFbilled in advance
Numezis 269'500 CHF2'263 CHFper month15'300 CHFbilled in advance
Numezis 4123'000 CHF3'986 CHFper month27'100 CHFbilled in advance

All shown. None hidden.

A return-on-investment calculation whose assumptions cannot be changed is a sales argument, not a calculation.

Price per user per month200 CHF, starting assumption, adjustable above
Horizon60 months by default
Machine priceComputed from the bill of materials, not typed in
Annual service22 % of the machine price, floor of 10,000 CHF
DepreciationStraight line; the residual value is shown at the horizon
Legal riskOptional toggle: flat cost of a confidentiality incident

What the spreadsheet does not say

Two items escape the calculation and often weigh more than it does. The first is risk: the cost of a confidentiality incident appears on no invoice, but it appears in a judgment. The second is actual usage: an internal tool that answers on your documents gets used, where a subscription bought for everyone gets used by a third of the seats.