AI inside a law firm, without a single exhibit leaving it.

A lawyer's professional secrecy is not a contract clause: it is a criminal-law duty. A machine with no outbound path settles the question by architecture, not by undertaking.

Talk to an engineer Configure

01 — THE CONSTRAINT

Art. 321 SCC

Disclosing a secret entrusted to a lawyer is a criminal offence prosecuted on complaint. Liability is personal and cannot be delegated to a vendor.

See every text

01 · USESearch ten years of archives for an exhibit, a clause or an internal precedent.

02 · USESummarise a heavy matter before a hearing, with the reference back to the exhibit.

03 · USEDraft a first version of a letter or brief, in the firm's own style.

04 · USECompare two versions of a contract and list the differences.

02 — THE OBJECTION

Isn't a confidentiality agreement with a vendor enough?

A contract organises redress after the breach. It does not prevent it, and it does not give you control of the data while it sits elsewhere. A machine with no path outward cannot commit the breach.

03 — THE SIZING

For a typical profile in this profession.

Computed, not chosen: headcount × peak ratio × weight of the work, against machine capacity. Your actual situation goes through the configurator.

Profile used	30 peopleLetters, notes, reports.
Concurrent sessions to absorb	8
Recommended machine	Numezis 20.5 % headroom
Required circuit	Standard T13 socket · 10 A circuit
List price	69'500 CHFservice 15'300 CHF / year

A case in this profession

A law firm moves from “AI is forbidden” to “AI cannot leave”.

Law firm

Before the machine

If the question is “where do we start” rather than “which machine”, the group's Advisory and Engineering practice handles exactly that.

The group